Gynaecology Research - Pap Smears, Laparoscopy, Ultrasound, Hysteroscopy

Gynaecology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Gynaecology, including details on pap smears, laparoscopy, ultrasound, hysteroscopy.


Gynaecology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Gynaecology

Books on Gynaecology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Auditing the use of colposcopy versus general gynecology clinics to investigate women with postcoital or intermenstrual bleeding: a case for a new outpatient service.

Harry VN, Cruickshank ME, Parkin DE

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. v.harry@abdn.ac.uk

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this audit was to determine whether initial referral to a general gynecology clinic (GOPD) or a colposcopy clinic is the most efficient means of managing women with postcoital (PCB) or intermenstrual (IMB) bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective audit of women with PCB or IMB was conducted. Sixty referrals from primary care were note-logged and alternatively allocated to either clinic. Data were collected by case note review. RESULTS: Sixty women were referred for abnormal bleeding, 33 (55%) of which were seen at the GOPD and 27 (45%) at the colposcopy clinic. Investigations included Chlamydia testing, which was deficient in both settings, whereas ultrasound scans and hysteroscopies were performed in 9% of patients attending the GOPD compared with none in the colposcopy clinic. The most common finding at the GOPD was cervical ectopy in 14 (42%) patients. No abnormality was found in 9 (28%) patients. At colposcopy, 14 (52%) had no abnormality detected, whereas 8 (30%) had cervical ectopy and 3 (11%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. There were no cases of malignancy found in this study. CONCLUSION: Most patients with PCB and IMB will not have a serious abnormality. Our study proposes that a new PCB/IMB outpatient service can improve the efficiency of treatment of these women by providing appropriate guidelines to standardize their care.

Published 6 April 2007 in J Low Genit Tract Dis, 11(2): 108-11.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Gynaecology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Gynaecology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Gynaecology Books

Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (BECKMAN))

Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (BECKMAN))