Gynaecology Research - Pap Smears, Laparoscopy, Ultrasound, Hysteroscopy

Gynaecology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Gynaecology, including details on pap smears, laparoscopy, ultrasound, hysteroscopy.


Gynaecology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Gynaecology

Books on Gynaecology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Limited importance of pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) in assisted reproduction outcome in the absence of embryo cryopreservation.

Nicoli A, Valli B, Di Girolamo R, Di Tommaso B, Gallinelli A, La Sala GB

Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova (ASMN), Reggio Emilia, Italy. alessia.nicoli@asmn.re.it

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that Z-score criteria represent a reliable predictor of implantation rate and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, excluding the possibility of embryo selection before the embryo transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova (ASMN), Reggio Emilia, Italy. PATIENT(S): We analyzed 393 pregnancies obtained by IVF or ICSI cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Morphologic evaluations of Z-score in pre-embryos obtained from IVF or ICSI cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluations of Z-scores, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): We did not find any statistically significant correlation between the Z-score of 1032 embryos transferred in 393 embryo transfers and the implantation rate or the pregnancy outcome. In particular, the best Z-score identified (Z1, 7.2%) did not seem to correlate with embryo implantation rate or pregnancy outcomes any better than those with worse scores (Z2, 6.9% and Z3, 85.9%). CONCLUSION(S): Our results seem to confirm that Z-score alone cannot be considered a better tool than standard morphologic criteria for identifying, controlling, or selecting embryos with a better chance of successful ongoing pregnancy.

Published 9 October 2007 in Fertil Steril, 88(4): 1167-73.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Gynaecology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Gynaecology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Gynaecology Books

The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes

The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes