Gynaecology Research - Pap Smears, Laparoscopy, Ultrasound, Hysteroscopy

Gynaecology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Gynaecology, including details on pap smears, laparoscopy, ultrasound, hysteroscopy.


Gynaecology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Gynaecology

Books on Gynaecology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Sonographic measurement of cervical volume in nonpregnant women using the geometric formula for a cylinder versus the three-dimensional automated virtual organ computer-aided analysis (vocal).

Papoutsis D, Daskalakis G, Antonakou A, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A

First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Greece.

BACKGROUND.: To sonographically evaluate the volume of uterine cervix in nonpregnant women with use of the geometric formula for a cylinder and to assess agreement with the reference Virtual Organ Computer-Aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) method. METHODS.: Three-dimensional ultrasound volume datasets of the uterine cervix from 81 women were obtained prospectively within a 1-year period. Volume measurements were performed using VOCAL and the geometric formula for a cylinder. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were produced to examine intermethod agreement. Time needed to perform measurements was compared with Student's t test. RESULTS.: There was good agreement between VOCAL and the geometric formula for a cylinder (mean percentage difference, -0.78%; 95% limits of agreement, -17.59-16.03%). Measurements made by the formula for a cylinder were slightly greater than VOCAL by a mean (±SE) of 0.78% (±0.95%). A high degree of reliability was observed between the two methods (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.95-0.98). Cervical volume estimation with the geometric formula for a cylinder was faster to obtain. CONCLUSIONS.: This method comparison study shows that the geometric formula for a cylinder has good agreement with VOCAL and can determine the volume of the cervix in a faster way. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2011.

Published 5 May 2011 in J Clin Ultrasound.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).


Articles on Gynaecology published 5 May 2011:

Effect of Maternal Age on the Risk of Stillbirth: A Population-Based Cohort Study on 37 Million Births in the United States.   Am J Perinatol.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the incidence and effect of maternal age on the risk of stillbirth. We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's "Linked Birth-Infant Death" and "Fetal Death" data files. We excluded all births of gestational age under 24 weeks and those with reported congenital malformations. We estimated the adjusted effect of maternal age on the risk of stillbirth using logistic regression ... [Abstract] [Full-text]

Perinatal Outcome in the Live-Born Infant with Prenatally Diagnosed Omphalocele.   Am J Perinatol.

We compared perinatal outcomes between live-born nonisolated and isolated omphaloceles diagnosed during a prenatal ultrasound. Fetuses ( N = 86) with omphalocele were identified between 1995 and 2007 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were an omphalocele > 14 weeks' gestation, available fetal and/or neonatal karyotype, and a live-born infant ( N = 46). Perinatal outcomes were compared in nonisolated ( N = 23) and isolated omphaloceles ( N = 23). For all ... [Abstract] [Full-text]

Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of gestational and type 2 diabetes.   Arch Gynecol Obstet.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether changes in interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) influence the risk of gestational and type 2 diabetes among a cohort of women with two consecutive live, singleton births of 20-44 weeks gestation (n = 232,272). METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to examine the risk for development of gestational or type 2 diabetes during the second pregnancy. Mothers with normal weight for both pregnancies (normal-normal) served as the referent group. RESULTS: ... [Abstract] [Full-text]

First patient treated with a re-challenge of catumaxomab in recurrent malignant ascites: a case report.   Med Oncol.

In the past, treatment for malignant ascites focussed on symptomatic relief or treatment of the underlying disease. A promising option evolved with catumaxomab (Removab(®)) in 2009. Since catumaxomab is a bispecific, trifunctional antibody with mouse-rat origin, so far repeated treatment cycles were not an option due to the occurrence of human anti-drug antibodies (HADA). Nevertheless, the good results obtained so far raised the question whether a repeated treatment cycle with catumaxomab ... [Abstract] [Full-text]

Prognostic Significance of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Infiltration Within Cancer Cell Nests in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.   Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21(4): 717-21.

[Abstract] [Full-text]

Prognosis and Reproducibility of New and Existing Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma Compared to FIGO Grading in Hysterectomy Specimens.   Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21(4): 654-60.

[Abstract] [Full-text]

No supportive evidence for clinical benefit of routine follow-up in ovarian cancer: a dutch multicenter study.   Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21(4): 647-53.

[Abstract] [Full-text]

Fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: oncologic safety and reproductive outcomes.   Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21(4): 640-6.

[Abstract] [Full-text]


© 2005-2011 Gynaecology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Gynaecology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2009)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 6 (2010)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 7 (2011)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)



Gynaecology Books

Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Crash Course)

Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Crash Course)